20.Mar.2011 The Rockometer: Angles by The Strokes

The Strokes
Angles
RCA Records

As a comeback single, The Strokes first in nearly five years, “Under Cover of Darkness,” is a shining example of everything the New York City five-piece does well.  It’s a more melodic interpretation of ’70s NYC punk mixed with the working class sensibilities of Thin Lizzy.  Guitarists Albert Hammond, Jr and Nick Valensi trade short, sharp stabs, longer, clashing notes, and later find room for an ecstatic arena rock riff.  The bass, meanwhile, is big and round and grooves.  It all leads to an rousing monster of a chorus where vocalist Julian Casablancas alternates between a free and easy croon and palpable agitation.  This is easily the band’s best single to date.

As a comeback album, Angles, is something quite different.  All five members, including bassist Nicolai Fraiture and drummer, Fab Moretti, contributed as songwriters.  Yet, at no point during the album’s recording process were all five Strokes actually in the same room at the same time.  As a result, Angles, sounds like an album where parts were mailed in and unrelated verses and choruses were pieced together; An album where no one had the gall to say, “No more electro and no more geeking out on your guitar.  That song’s a b-side and that one’s rubbish.”

Take, “Two Kinds of Happiness,” for example, a new-wave inspired track where Fraiture’s bass and Moretti’s drumming hint at the darker, dance-pop of New Order.  The guitars and vocals, on the other hand, go in a poppier direction, like that of Ric Ocasek and The Cars.  The chorus is a third disjointed piece with Casablancas emoting like Bono and Hammond and Valenti playing speedy, prog-metal riffs.  It’s a mess.

Then, there’s “Machu Pichu” and “Games” where during the verses the band unconvincingly dabbles in the electro and world-beat made popular by another NYC band who’ve had to fend off accusations of being more style than substance, Vampire Weekend.  “Metabolism” goes off on yet another tangent with dramatic space-rock and prog-rock, guitar excess.

Only occasionally, does this non-collaborative approach to being in a band work.  On “Taken For a Fool,” the group’s electro, dance-punk fixation pays off, when a robotic verse smoothly transitions to a more traditional rock chorus, effectively showing what Angles could have been if everyone in the band had been actively engaged.  And, “Gratification,” succeeds because it’s The Strokes simply being The Strokes.  There’s no attempt to redefine the sound here — Just that tested blend of mid-’70s punk and glam.

Let’s give the band some credit.  The easy path would have been to fill Angles with ten takes on their debut album, Is This It.  The fans would have lapped it up and they would have been critical, if not commercial successes, again.  Instead, they took the more difficult road, incorporating foreign elements into their sound, opting to use their first new album in five years as a chance to experiment and expand upon what it is to be The Strokes.   Too bad all five Strokes didn’t have the same vision and couldn’t be bothered to share their unique visions with each other.  5 out of 10 on The Rockometer.

VIDEO: The Strokes – Under Cover of Darkness


Comment Pages

There are 2 Comments to "The Rockometer: Angles by The Strokes"

  • Andrew says:

    I was discussing this album with a friend, who made the point that the dumbest thing The Strokes ever did was acknowledge the fragmented recording process they used. He argues that because we knew ahead of time how this was recorded, that we thus listen explicitly for instances where you can notice the disjointed sounds. My friend feels that the album would be much better received if we didn’t know ahead of time that they recorded it this way.

    I thought it was an interesting point. Which isn’t to say I disagree with your review. In fact, I really couldn’t agree more with your review. I have all the same problems and issues with it that you do. But I can’t help but wonder if ignorance wouldn’t have been bliss in this case. I think there would still be some general discomfort at the tension between the different parts/styles, but without knowing that I was supposed to be listening for evidence of turmoil, I would have listened to the album more at face value.

    I don’t know, I just thought it was an interesting thought. Maybe I’m just trying to rationalize the disappointment of this album.

  • Bill Lipold says:

    I will say this, the band surely upset their label handlers by admitting before the album’s release that Julian Casablancas wasn’t very involved and that they felt they have a better album in them.

    Still, when I think about the album’s main weakness, (The fact that on multiple songs there’s an obvious disconnect between verse and chorus, like they had a bunch of unrelated parts sitting around the studio and just started piecing songs together), it would still be a sticking point regardless of what we did or didn’t know about its recording. There have been classic albums made by bands who weren’t exactly getting along during recording — Exile on Main Street comes immediately to mind.

    Personally, when I was putting together the review, the interviews were in the back of my mind, but only became relevant when it came time to analyzing why the album was so disjointed. Going back to my notes, the first thing I wrote when listening to Angles was, “Some odd choices for a comeback album.”

    Without the interview, reasons for the albums lack of structure would have been speculation. The band, however, gave us reasons to back up those assertions. They provided the story line to go with the review.

Write a Comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

My Front Pages